Accounting firms’ challenge of selling additional services

// August 2nd, 2009 // The Practice Paradox

Over the past 18 years I have worked in and around professional service firms, including industrial design firms, business and marketing consultancies, a medical device research and development start-up, a business software development consultancy, and accounting  firms. Each of these businesses has had one thing in common: ’selling the intangible’; they are ‘knowledge firms’ employing, as Peter Drucker coined it many years ago, ‘knowledge workers’ who create, develop and use intellectual property (IP) to create value for clients.

Knowledge-based businesses are faced with a unique set of challenges including (among many others) finding and retaining talent, building knowledge management systems, and persuading clients to invest in ‘the invisible’; that is, services that  are intangible and therefore impossible to evaluate in advance of experiencing them.

Out of all these businesses, however, one type in particular struggles with selling the value of what they do—or rather, what they could do—for clients, and that is accounting firms.

How have I come to notice this?

In 2001 I co-founded businessfitness™, a firm that specialises in improving the performance of accounting firms. Each year we’d conduct an exhaustive benchmarking study of the accounting profession in Australia and publish a report called The Good, the Bad & the Ugly® of the Accounting Profession. We’d survey hundreds of firms, analyse the data, identify the high-performing firms, interview them about the way they lead, structure and manage their businesses, then write about these ‘best practices’. I was fortunate enough to be intimately involved in this process and I had the privilege of interviewing and spending time with many practitioners from high performing progressive firms around Australia.

In the process I learnt a lot.

Over the 8 years from 2001 to 2009 I encountered hundreds of accounting firms in my work with businessfitness. This built on my prior experience working with the accounting industry when back in the mid-1990’s where I was with The Results Corporation when we ran the very first Accountants Boot Camp, and later with Paul Dunn-led spin-off company Results Accountants Systems where I was in charge of Systems Research & Development (that is, developing and ‘productising’ the firm’s intellectual property).

15 years on, I see that many accounting firms are still coming to grips with the challenge of providing higher value optional services to their clients.

So what is holding firms back?

It’s a combination of lacking the right psychology, the right skills and the right systems for ’selling the intangible’ to clients.

Not until a firm can sell additional value, can they add additional value to clients.

This blog, my books, our webinars and consulting services will teach accounting firm practitioners and staff how to do just that.

I look forward to sharing this journey with you …

The services that most accounting firms would love to provide to their clients, and which are of great benefit to their clients, accounting firms don’t know how to sell.

2 Responses to “Accounting firms’ challenge of selling additional services”

  1. David Buchan says:

    The exercise of learning how to provide additional value is challenging because it is worth doing. In the midst of this phenomena myself I can offer some observations from my own experience.

    I used to find that I was blocked from offering work because I was afraid they would say no. My fragile self-esteem and all that. Ironically, and this is what most people miss, is that if no offer of additional value is ever made, potential clients don’t have the opportunity to say yes either.

    Earlier this year I read ‘Go For No” by Richard Fenton and Andrea Waltz. It describes why we should be shooting for a minimum number of no responses in order to get enough people saying yes. This turns everything on its head. If you are not getting sufficient people saying no, then you are not making enough offers of value to your clients.

    • MC says:

      Excellent points David. Thanks for raising the issue of self-esteem and the feelings of rejection that accompany a client or prospective client saying ‘No’ to a proposal. Having ‘thick skin’ and being able to pick yourself up, dust yourself off and move on to the next opportunity with an “oh well, every No is one step closer to a Yes” attitude is a prerequisite for an effective rainmaker in an accounting firm. Call it resilience, call it internal locus of control, call it determination … we can call it whatever we like, but this ability to not take “No’s” personally and to not let it affect our energy or optimism for succeeding with the next proposal is an inherited trait in some, and a learned trait in others. That’s why I believe it’s essential to psychologically profile each person in an accounting firm to see their natural and adaptive behaviour in these areas. This is one of the firsts steps we implement in our Clientshare Improvement Process with firms. (We use the DiSC communication style methodology, but there are many others such as Myers-Briggs, TMS, Personality Plus, Enneagram, etc.) It is incredibly enlightening to discover there are often people in roles that they are just not cut out for and are unlikely to succeed, regardless of the amount of sales training and rainmaking coaching they receive. Thanks for focusing in on this resilience factor David. You’ve reminded me to give that special mention in the book I’m writing about rainmaking.

Leave a Reply